Equalityの例文や意味・使い方に関するQ&A

「Equality」を含む文の意味

Q: ‎gender equality とはどういう意味ですか?
A: gender = man, woman
equality = equal + ity (becomes adjective)

it means women are equal to men, they have the same rights by law
Q: equality とはどういう意味ですか?
A:
mayar ...🤔

「Equality」の使い方・例文

Q: equality を使った例文を教えて下さい。
A: 1. We value equality.
2. Women want equality in the workplace.
3. We have not yet achieved racial equality.
4. It is difficult to achieve economic equality.

「Equality」の類語とその違い

Q: equality と equity はどう違いますか?
A: Equity also means the quality of being fair and/or impartial.

So equality might mean everyone pays exactly the same amount in taxes.
Equity means that those more able to pay should pay more taxes.
Q: social equality と social equity はどう違いますか?
A: QAの全文をご確認ください
Q: equality と equation はどう違いますか?
A: In mathematics, they mean the same thing though we usually use the word equation.

In general English, we use the word equality when we are talking about people having same opportunities. For example, we want equality in pay for men and women. So equation is for math, equality for equal rights

「Equality」を翻訳

Q: equality は 英語 (アメリカ) で何と言いますか?
A: QAの全文をご確認ください
Q: equality は 英語 (イギリス) で何と言いますか?
A: QAの全文をご確認ください
Q: equality は 英語 (アメリカ) で何と言いますか?
A: QAの全文をご確認ください

「Equality」についての他の質問

Q: prompt equality globally. この表現は自然ですか?
A: It does actually work. It's in the style of a slogan
Q: When it comes to gender equality in Japan, lower percentage of women in the Diet is often mentioned. この表現は自然ですか?
A: When it comes to gender equality in Japan, lower percentage of women on a diet is often mentioned.
Q: caught, equality, hailedの発音を音声で教えてください。
A: QAの全文をご確認ください
Q: Equality is one of the most complicated problems. That’s because its definition isn’t clear in the first place. For example, if I said this society should recommend women’s active role, I think this also means lack of respect of men. Therefore, when we’ll mention about equality , we have to define what equality is for the first. この表現は自然ですか?
A: Your answer:
Equality is one of the most complicated problems.(1) That’s because its definition isn’t clear in the first place. For example, if I said this society should recommend women’s active role, I think this also means lack of respect of (2) men. Therefore, when we’ll (4) mention about (5) equality , we have to define what equality is for the first (6).

1. "It" vs "that"
"I went to an amusement park last weekend. It was fun." Using "it" here means the amusement park itself was fun.
"I went to an amusement park last weekend. That was fun." Using "that" here means going to the amusement park as well as the park itself was fun.
You can use either depending on what emphasis you want to place on the previous sentence. Using "it" simply takes the place of the phrase you just mentioned, in order for you to give the reason why. Using "that" means you are placing more of an emphasis on the previous statement being interesting, while still accomplishing what using "it" would be doing. You could also just eliminate either word and the period, replacing it with a comma like so "...problems, because its...".

2. "Of" vs "for"...
In the example "Here is the correction OF the test", using OF implies that the correction and the test are the same entity and the correction is a component of the test. In the example "Here is the correction FOR the test", using FOR implies that the correction is a separate entity designed specifically for usage on the test. So you want for because respect is separate from men and is the item being used (or not used in this scenario) on the man.

3. Starting with the word "when" puts you in present tense, not future tense. It is as if you are referring to a particular instance in time as if it were the present. Given this, the next action words should be present tense as well "we [do something]" instead of "we will [do something]".

4. "Mention" can be used instead of "talk about" which I believe is what you going for. You can use either but "mention about" does not work. It is like saying "talk about about" since mention = talk about.

5. "First we must..." or "we have to cook first" is good sentence structure whereas adding on "for the" infront of "first" is not. I am not sure exactly how to explain this one but I think of it as not adding unnecessary words and "for the" is not needed before you say "first".

Corrected:
Equality is one of the most complicated problems. It/that is because its definition isn’t clear in the first place. For example, if I said this society should recommend women’s active role, I think this also means lack of respect for men. Therefore, when we mention equality, we have to define what equality is first.

関連する単語やフレーズの意味・使い方

新着ワード

equality

HiNativeは、一般ユーザー同士が互いに知識を共有しあうQ&Aサービスです。回答が必ず合っているという保証はございません。

新着質問
話題の質問
オススメの質問