- 日本語
-
中国語 (簡体字)
-
英語 (アメリカ)
-
フランス語 (フランス)
Do you see why they are framed in such an inflexible style from our modern point of view? Because if they were not the same composition and background, readers of that time would not have been able to recognize the same people in each panel. No, they might be able to do enough, but in an era when cartooning was governed by the norm of the master-slave relationship between text and drawing, the new norm that the figures in each panel were the same persons without any textual explanation, and the different poses were due to the passage of time, was an artistic challenge for late 19th century newspaper consumers, though this challenge eventually led to the creation of the comic strip as we call it today. この表現は自然ですか?
- ドイツ語
- 英語 (アメリカ)
不自然
Do you see why they are framed in such an inflexible style from our modern point of view?
Because if they were not the same composition and background, readers of that time would not have been able to recognize the same people in each panel.
No,In they might be able to do enough, but in an era when cartooning was governed by the norm of the master-slave relationship between text and drawing, the new norm that, without any textual explanation, the figurescharacters in each panel were the same persons withoutwith any textual explanation, and the different poses werebeing duea toresult of the passage of time, was an artistic challenge for late 19th century newspaper consumers, though this challenge eventually led to the creation of the comic strip as we call it today.
No,In they might be able to do enough, but in an era when cartooning was governed by the norm of the master-slave relationship between text and drawing, the new norm that, without any textual explanation, the figurescharacters in each panel were the same persons withoutwith any textual explanation, and the different poses werebeing duea toresult of the passage of time, was an artistic challenge for late 19th century newspaper consumers, though this challenge eventually led to the creation of the comic strip as we call it today.
この回答は役に立ちましたか?
- ドイツ語
- 英語 (アメリカ)
不自然
Do you see why they are framed in such an inflexible style from our modern point of view?
Because if they were not the same composition and background, readers of that time would not have been able to recognize the same people in each panel.
No,In they might be able to do enough, but in an era when cartooning was governed by the norm of the master-slave relationship between text and drawing, the new norm that, without any textual explanation, the figurescharacters in each panel were the same persons withoutwith any textual explanation, and the different poses werebeing duea toresult of the passage of time, was an artistic challenge for late 19th century newspaper consumers, though this challenge eventually led to the creation of the comic strip as we call it today.
No,In they might be able to do enough, but in an era when cartooning was governed by the norm of the master-slave relationship between text and drawing, the new norm that, without any textual explanation, the figurescharacters in each panel were the same persons withoutwith any textual explanation, and the different poses werebeing duea toresult of the passage of time, was an artistic challenge for late 19th century newspaper consumers, though this challenge eventually led to the creation of the comic strip as we call it today.
Generally it's best to split passages like this into smaller sentences where possible, but this is more of a stylistic choice rather than a grammatical error.
この回答は役に立ちましたか?
- 英語 (イギリス)
- 英語 (アメリカ)
大体合ってるけど少し不自然
DoCan you see why, theyfrom our modern point of view, the illustrations are framed in such an inflexible style from our modern point of viewway?
DoCan you see why, theyfrom our modern point of view, the illustrations are framed in such an inflexible style from our modern point of viewway?
Because if they weredid not have the same composition and background, readers of that time[/the era] would not have been able to recognize that it was the same peopleperson in each panel.
Because if they weredid not have the same composition and background, readers of that time[/the era] would not have been able to recognize that it was the same peopleperson in each panel.
No,It theywas mightan beera able to do enough, but in anwhich erathe whencartoon cartooningindustry was governed by the norm of the master-slave relationship betweenof text and its accompanying drawing,. theAlthough newsome normreaders may have been able to gather that the figuresyellow character in each panel werewas the same personsperson without any textual explanation, and19th thecentury differentnewspaper posesconsumers werestruggled due to theconceptualise passage of timecartoons,. wasThis an artistic challenge for late 19th century newspaper consumers, though this challenge eventually led to the creation of the “comic strip” as we call it today.
No,It theywas mightan beera able to do enough, but in anwhich erathe whencartoon cartooningindustry was governed by the norm of the master-slave relationship betweenof text and its accompanying drawing,. theAlthough newsome normreaders may have been able to gather that the figuresyellow character in each panel werewas the same personsperson without any textual explanation, and19th thecentury differentnewspaper posesconsumers werestruggled due to theconceptualise passage of timecartoons,. wasThis an artistic challenge for late 19th century newspaper consumers, though this challenge eventually led to the creation of the “comic strip” as we call it today.
この回答は役に立ちましたか?
- 英語 (イギリス)
- 英語 (アメリカ)
大体合ってるけど少し不自然
@eric1357 I do agree that there were a few too many run-on sentences that made it very difficult to keep up with what you were intending to say. 😅
この回答は役に立ちましたか?
- ドイツ語
- 英語 (アメリカ)
不自然
@dorami_9000 Depending on the context the text is written in, it is also very uncommon to address the reader directly, for example if this was meant as an article in a newspaper.
この回答は役に立ちましたか?
- 日本語
- 日本語
- 英語 (アメリカ)
大体合ってるけど少し不自然
Do you see why they are framed in such an inflexible style from our modern point of view?
BecauseIf if they were not the same composition and background, readers of that time would not have been able to recognize the same people in each panel.
BecauseIf if they were not the same composition and background, readers of that time would not have been able to recognize the same people in each panel.
No,In theythat might be able to do enoughera, but in an era when cartooning was governed by the norm of the master-slave relationship, betweenin both text and drawing. Today, due to the passage of time, the new norm thatin the drawings show the figures in each panel wereto be the same persons without any textual explanation. Also, and the figures have different poses, wereas due to the passage of timewell,.
This was an artistic challenge for late 19th century newspaper consumers,. thoughThis this challenge eventually led to the creation of the comic strip, as we call it today.
No,In theythat might be able to do enoughera, but in an era when cartooning was governed by the norm of the master-slave relationship, betweenin both text and drawing. Today, due to the passage of time, the new norm thatin the drawings show the figures in each panel wereto be the same persons without any textual explanation. Also, and the figures have different poses, wereas due to the passage of timewell,.
This was an artistic challenge for late 19th century newspaper consumers,. thoughThis this challenge eventually led to the creation of the comic strip, as we call it today.
この回答は役に立ちましたか?
HiNativeなら、無料でネイティブスピーカーがあなたの文章を添削してくれます✍️✨
- Do you put on make up everyday?
- How did you do? と How are you going? はどう違いますか?
- who do you think is the most famous Japanese ?
Generally it's best to split passages like this into smaller sentences where possible, but this is more of a stylistic choice rather than a grammatical error.