- 日本語
-
中国語 (簡体字)
-
英語 (アメリカ)
-
フランス語 (フランス)
"A primitive argument?" Mr. Tagawa, the more solid and finer arguments on this issue will not begin until much later. That will be after you retire as a comic strip artist in dozens years, so I won't discuss it now. Instead, I'll show you an interesting stuff. It's an animated movie called "Oswald the Lucky Rabbit." It was created by Walt Disney. It was a popular animated series in the 1920s. Universal Pictures, a Hollywood company, approached an independent film distributor and made a deal for it to supply Universal with animated shorts on a regular basis as a prelude to its features, and the distributor approached Disney Studios to plan and produce a new series of animated shorts. This was "Oswald the Lucky Rabbit". Walt was so pleased with the popularity of the series that he asked the distributor, Winkler Pictures, for a larger share of the profits. He thought he could negotiate in his favor since his studio had planned and produced the series and thought it was impossible that other studios would continue to produce it. But in fact, that's not how things turned out. For Winkler Pictures, Disney was just a subcontractor, and if Disney refused to continue making the Oswald series, they could - did - take their animators out of the Disney studio and have them create a new studio to continue making the Oswald series
"Didn't Oswald belong to Walt?" If it were a comic strip character and Walt was the original creator of the comic strip, then yes. But this was an animation, a movie. Even if Walt had known about the "Mutt and Jeff" court case at the time and used it as a legal basis for claiming Oswald belonged to him, Winkler Pictures would not have taken it seriously. この表現は自然ですか？
"Didn't Oswald belong to Walt?" If it were a comic strip character and Walt was the original creator of the comic strip, then yes. But this was an animation, a movie. Even if Walt had known about the "Mutt and Jeff" court case at the time and used it as a legal basis for claiming Oswald belonged to him, Winkler Pictures would not have taken it seriously. この表現は自然ですか？
- 英語 (アメリカ)
- イタリア語 準ネイティブ
大体合ってるけど少し不自然
"A primitive argument?" Mr. Tagawa, the more solid and finer arguments on this issue will not begin until much later.
"A primitive argument?" Mr. Tagawa, the more solid and finer arguments on this issue will not begin until much later.
That will be after you retire as a comic strip artist in dozens of years, so I won't discuss it now.
That will be after you retire as a comic strip artist in dozens of years, so I won't discuss it now.
Instead, I'll show you ansomething interesting stuff.
Instead, I'll show you ansomething interesting stuff.
It's an animatedanimation movie called "Oswald the Lucky Rabbit."
It's an animatedanimation movie called "Oswald the Lucky Rabbit."
It was created by Walt Disney and became a popular animated series in the 1920s.
It was created by Walt Disney and became a popular animated series in the 1920s.
It was a popular animated series in the 1920s.
It was a popular animated series in the 1920s.
Universal Pictures, a Hollywood company, approached an independent film distributor and made a deal for it to supply Universal with animated shorts on a regular basis as a prelude to its features,. andThe the distributor in turn approached Disney Studios to plan and produce a new series of animated shorts, which became "Oswald the Lucky Rabbit".
Universal Pictures, a Hollywood company, approached an independent film distributor and made a deal for it to supply Universal with animated shorts on a regular basis as a prelude to its features,. andThe the distributor in turn approached Disney Studios to plan and produce a new series of animated shorts, which became "Oswald the Lucky Rabbit".
This was "Oswald the Lucky Rabbit".
This was "Oswald the Lucky Rabbit".
Walt was so pleased with the popularity of the series that he asked the distributor, Winkler Pictures, for a larger share of the profits.
He thought he could negotiate in his favor since his studio had planned and produced the series, and thoughthe considered it was impossible thatfor other studios wouldto continue to produce it.
He thought he could negotiate in his favor since his studio had planned and produced the series, and thoughthe considered it was impossible thatfor other studios wouldto continue to produce it.
ButIn in factreality, that's not how things turned out.
ButIn in factreality, that's not how things turned out.
ForTo Winkler Pictures, Disney was just a subcontractor,; and ifonce Disney refused to continue making the Oswald series, theyWinkler could -(and did) - take theirthe Oswald animators out of the Disney studio, andcreating have them create a new studio to continue making the Oswald series.
ForTo Winkler Pictures, Disney was just a subcontractor,; and ifonce Disney refused to continue making the Oswald series, theyWinkler could -(and did) - take theirthe Oswald animators out of the Disney studio, andcreating have them create a new studio to continue making the Oswald series.
"Didn't Oswald belong to Walt?" If it were a comic strip character and Walt was the original creator of the comic strip, then yes.
But this was an animation, a movie.
Even if Walt had known about the "Mutt and Jeff" court case at the time and used it as a legal basis for claiming Oswald belonged to him, Winkler Pictures would not have taken it seriously.
- 英語 (アメリカ)
大体合ってるけど少し不自然
"A primitive argument?" [Who is saying this?] Mr. Tagawa, the more solid and finer arguments on this issue will not begin until much later.
"A primitive argument?" [Who is saying this?] Mr. Tagawa, the more solid and finer arguments on this issue will not begin until much later.
That will be after you retire as a comic strip artist in dozens years, so I won't discuss it now.
Instead, I'll show you ansomething interesting stuff.
Instead, I'll show you ansomething interesting stuff.
It's an animated movie called "Oswald the Lucky Rabbit," created by Walt Disney."
It's an animated movie called "Oswald the Lucky Rabbit," created by Walt Disney."
It was created by Walt Disney.
It was created by Walt Disney.
It was a popular animated series in the 1920s.
Universal Pictures, a Hollywood company, approached an independent film distributor and made a deal for it to supply Universal with animated shorts on a regular basis as a prelude to its features,. andThe the distributor approached Disney Studios to plan and produce a new series of animated shorts.
Universal Pictures, a Hollywood company, approached an independent film distributor and made a deal for it to supply Universal with animated shorts on a regular basis as a prelude to its features,. andThe the distributor approached Disney Studios to plan and produce a new series of animated shorts.
This was "Oswald the Lucky Rabbit".
Walt was so pleased with the popularity of the series that he asked the distributor, Winkler Pictures, for a larger share of the profits.
He thought he could negotiate in his favor since his studio had planned and produced the series and thought it was impossible that other studios would continue to produce it.
But in fact, that's not how things turned out.
For Winkler Pictures, Disney was just a subcontractor, and if Disney refused to continue making the Oswald series, they could -(and did) - take their animators out of the Disney studio and have them create a new studio to continue making the Oswald series
For Winkler Pictures, Disney was just a subcontractor, and if Disney refused to continue making the Oswald series, they could -(and did) - take their animators out of the Disney studio and have them create a new studio to continue making the Oswald series
"Didn't Oswald belong to Walt?" If it were a comic strip character and Walt was the original creator of the comic strip, then yes.
But this was an animation, a movie.
Even if Walt had known about the "Mutt and Jeff" court case at the time and used it as a legal basis for claiming Oswald belonged to him, Winkler Pictures would not have taken it seriously.
- 日本語
- 英語 (アメリカ)
大体合ってるけど少し不自然
@dorami_9000 No problem, I think you should add "Tagawa asked" or something else similar (unless you already said it and it was cut off)
- 日本語
- 英語 (アメリカ)
- 日本語
- 英語 (アメリカ)
- イタリア語 準ネイティブ
大体合ってるけど少し不自然
"A primitive argument?" Mr. Tagawa, the more solid and finer arguments on this issue will not begin until much later.
"A primitive argument?" Mr. Tagawa, the more solid and finer arguments on this issue will not begin until much later.
That will be after you retire as a comic strip artist in dozens of years, so I won't discuss it now.
That will be after you retire as a comic strip artist in dozens of years, so I won't discuss it now.
Instead, I'll show you ansomething interesting stuff.
Instead, I'll show you ansomething interesting stuff.
It's an animatedanimation movie called "Oswald the Lucky Rabbit."
It's an animatedanimation movie called "Oswald the Lucky Rabbit."
It was created by Walt Disney and became a popular animated series in the 1920s.
It was created by Walt Disney and became a popular animated series in the 1920s.
It was a popular animated series in the 1920s.
It was a popular animated series in the 1920s.
Universal Pictures, a Hollywood company, approached an independent film distributor and made a deal for it to supply Universal with animated shorts on a regular basis as a prelude to its features,. andThe the distributor in turn approached Disney Studios to plan and produce a new series of animated shorts, which became "Oswald the Lucky Rabbit".
Universal Pictures, a Hollywood company, approached an independent film distributor and made a deal for it to supply Universal with animated shorts on a regular basis as a prelude to its features,. andThe the distributor in turn approached Disney Studios to plan and produce a new series of animated shorts, which became "Oswald the Lucky Rabbit".
This was "Oswald the Lucky Rabbit".
This was "Oswald the Lucky Rabbit".
Walt was so pleased with the popularity of the series that he asked the distributor, Winkler Pictures, for a larger share of the profits.
He thought he could negotiate in his favor since his studio had planned and produced the series, and thoughthe considered it was impossible thatfor other studios wouldto continue to produce it.
He thought he could negotiate in his favor since his studio had planned and produced the series, and thoughthe considered it was impossible thatfor other studios wouldto continue to produce it.
ButIn in factreality, that's not how things turned out.
ButIn in factreality, that's not how things turned out.
ForTo Winkler Pictures, Disney was just a subcontractor,; and ifonce Disney refused to continue making the Oswald series, theyWinkler could -(and did) - take theirthe Oswald animators out of the Disney studio, andcreating have them create a new studio to continue making the Oswald series.
ForTo Winkler Pictures, Disney was just a subcontractor,; and ifonce Disney refused to continue making the Oswald series, theyWinkler could -(and did) - take theirthe Oswald animators out of the Disney studio, andcreating have them create a new studio to continue making the Oswald series.
"Didn't Oswald belong to Walt?" If it were a comic strip character and Walt was the original creator of the comic strip, then yes.
But this was an animation, a movie.
Even if Walt had known about the "Mutt and Jeff" court case at the time and used it as a legal basis for claiming Oswald belonged to him, Winkler Pictures would not have taken it seriously.
- 日本語
HiNativeなら、無料でネイティブスピーカーがあなたの文章を添削してくれます✍️✨
- an argument over money と an argument about money はどう違いますか？
- This argument supports my hypothesis. Thus, this protein could be a good therapeutic target. この表...
- Obama’s best argument, however, is not the fine print but the fact that the deal is better than a...
とは？
興味ある言語のレベルを表しています。レベルを設定すると、他のユーザーがあなたの質問に回答するときの参考にしてくれます。
-
初級
この言語で回答されると理解できない。
-
初中級
簡単な内容であれば理解できる。
-
中級
少し長めの文章でもある程度は理解できる。
-
上級
長い文章や複雑な内容でもだいたい理解できる。
